Is Ward really hard on the Beaver?

16 11 2009


It’s hard to for me to not comment on local affairs when stories like this, written by Recorder superstar reporter Jessica Maher, are begging for further commentary.
One theme brought out in the story is whether Amsterdam should continue to have wards, or elect representatives on an “at-large” basis. I have to agree with that sentiment.
This year, all Common Council races were contested. Unfortunately, many races saw candidates who would be an asset to Amsterdam, but they couldn’t win because of the ward system
By way of example, here’s what I thought of the candidates, from strongest to weakest:
1. Julie Pierce
2. Gina DeRossi
3. Kevin Phelps
4. Joe Isabel
5. Chad Ahr
6. Robert Martin
7. William Wills
8. Robin Raciborski
9. Diane Hatzenbuhler
10. Ronald Wierzbicki
11. Richard Leggiero
12. Mark Capone
If the city voted on the candidates based on the order I have listed, the 1st and 2nd Wards would have the majority representation on the council. However, if you added two at-large positions, there would be another 3rd Ward representative and someone from the 4th Ward.
The 5th Ward, as it stands, would have no direct representation, but the problem there is while Leggiero is fantastic at addressing the so-called “hyper-local” needs of his constituency, I have to agree that the 5th Ward is mostly a South Side district.
So why get rid of the ward system? Easy.
Pierce and DeRossi were, in my opinion, head and shoulders over every candidate for the council. Phelps lives in “the suck” of Amsterdam, but his experiences in the roughest neighborhoods of the city give him the know-how when it comes to dealing with the city’s toughest problems. There’s no question that Isabel, who could show more leadership on the council, really cares about the community and wants it to do well.
I was also impressed by Ahr, who, while being a salesman, has some “outside the box” ideas that could help this community.
Here’s the kicker. Amsterdam lost out on having guys like Kevin Phelps and Chad Ahr serving on the council because they ran in wards that featured stronger candidates.
Meanwhile, in the 4th and 5th wards, voters there were stuck with weaker candidates because they had no choice.
I understand the argument against doing away with wards because it leads to the possibility of one section of a community controlling the rest. In Kinston, N.C., where I worked before I came back home, all city council seats are “at-large,” but three council members are literally neighbors and all vote in the same voting precinct.
However, as shown in the last election, Amsterdam lost out on having some solid government representation because of its antiquated ward system.




2 responses

16 11 2009
Jerry Skrocki

I have been advocating for East End improvements since I bought my 5th Ward home on Grove Street in March.

Statistically, the East End Neighborhood is the most racially diverse, least educated with the highest poverty level of any other area of the city. It also has the highest percentage of renter occupied homes. It is the neighborhood in Amsterdam with the largest need for improvement and the least means to achieve it. I commend Mark Capone for bringing attention to the neglected East End Neighborhood by running for Alderman. Unfortunately his campaign started much too late to be effective and the the statistics of the East End suggest that this population is the least likely to vote.

With the 2010 census comes the requirement to review Ward boundaries and establish equitable distribution of representation.

Amsterdam City Charter Article III C-26
Reapportionment of Common Council representation.
Within three months following official publication of the results of each federal decennial or quinquennial census, if such has been conducted, the Common Council shall review the ward boundaries in relationship to the census results and make such adjustments by local law as may be necessary to assure that each ward contains, as nearly as practicable, an equal number of residents.

Perhaps this would be the best opportunity for necessary change.

7 12 2009
Who’s got your back? « The Venner Vox

[…] council candidates voted in by everyone in the city. I touched on this a bit on my personal blog, Krab-cakes and Football, in what some Recorder staffers are calling the “Common Council power rankings.” The […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: